<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Are Living in the Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://postpostmodern.com/editorial/we-are-living-in-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://postpostmodern.com/editorial/we-are-living-in-the-future/</link>
	<description>Speaking of web development.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:17:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan-O</title>
		<link>http://postpostmodern.com/editorial/we-are-living-in-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.postpostmodern.com/2007/01/09/we-are-living-in-the-future/#comment-456</guid>
		<description>Even though Windows-based computers (and other devises) have come a long way over the past 30 years, they still operate using the same basic principle today: &quot;PEOPLE trying to speak a COMPUTER&#039;s language.&quot;

From the first &quot;byte,&quot; Apple has remained intensely focused on shifting that paradigm. With each new technology, they find a fresh way to refine their focus: &quot;COMPUTERS learning to speak the HUMAN language.&quot;

With the iPhone, Apple appears to have lowered the limbo bar of innovation yet again.  &quot;Okay, competition, How low can you go?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though Windows-based computers (and other devises) have come a long way over the past 30 years, they still operate using the same basic principle today: &#8220;PEOPLE trying to speak a COMPUTER&#8217;s language.&#8221;</p>

<p>From the first &#8220;byte,&#8221; Apple has remained intensely focused on shifting that paradigm. With each new technology, they find a fresh way to refine their focus: &#8220;COMPUTERS learning to speak the HUMAN language.&#8221;</p>

<p>With the iPhone, Apple appears to have lowered the limbo bar of innovation yet again.  &#8220;Okay, competition, How low can you go?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason C</title>
		<link>http://postpostmodern.com/editorial/we-are-living-in-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.postpostmodern.com/2007/01/09/we-are-living-in-the-future/#comment-455</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re the only person I know who puts 85% of their post in a footnote. However, I think you nailed a lot about what makes the iPhone important and what hinders many well-intentioned design ideas. As an engineer myself (totally different field, of course) I think engineers tend to make the absolute worst industrial designers. It&#039;s simply not their role in the process.

Also, I think it&#039;s important to note that for Apple, the UI doesn&#039;t end at the phones docking port. The ability to easily sync. the iPhone with a pc can&#039;t be overstated, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re the only person I know who puts 85% of their post in a footnote. However, I think you nailed a lot about what makes the iPhone important and what hinders many well-intentioned design ideas. As an engineer myself (totally different field, of course) I think engineers tend to make the absolute worst industrial designers. It&#8217;s simply not their role in the process.</p>

<p>Also, I think it&#8217;s important to note that for Apple, the UI doesn&#8217;t end at the phones docking port. The ability to easily sync. the iPhone with a pc can&#8217;t be overstated, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
